Royal Philanthropic Society v County (1985) 276 EG 1068
In this case the defendant was a licensee using a room in a school but, on his marriage, the school provided him with a house to use at a very low rent, it always having been understood in the past that these houses went with the job and had to be vacated if the job went. The Court of Appeal held that the defendant was a tenant, again authority for the strict adherence to the rule that persons in exclusive possession of premises are tenants, not licensees.
This study area has been created by our experts to help students with Administrative Law Essay and Problem Questions. If you require further help with your question, why not order a fully customised model answer on which to base your assignment? Use our online order form to submit your request and you could have a complete model answer written to your specification within 24 hours.
