Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co (1951) 1 KB 805
The plaintiff needed a weeding dress cleaned. She brought it to the defendant and was then asked to sign the receipt “because the defendants would not for certain specified risks, including the risk of damage by or to the beads and sequins with which the dress was trimmed.”
There was a serious unexplained stain. The plaintiff sued. The finding of the trial judge was that the beads were not used as an example, but were exhaustive.
This study area has been created by our experts to help students with Administrative Law Essay and Problem Questions. If you require further help with your question, why not order a fully customised model answer on which to base your assignment? Use our online order form to submit your request and you could have a complete model answer written to your specification within 24 hours.
