Johnson v Lyttle's Iron Agency (1877) 5 ChD 687, CA
This case involved an action by a shareholder against the company.
James L.J. said: "The notice did not comply strictly with the provisions of the contract between the company and the shareholders which is contained in the regulations of table A."
This study area has been created by our experts to help students with Administrative Law Essay and Problem Questions. If you require further help with your question, why not order a fully customised model answer on which to base your assignment? Use our online order form to submit your request and you could have a complete model answer written to your specification within 24 hours.
